Massive FY16Q4 For Dutech Holdings – Digging Deep To Understand The Impact Of Metric Group Acquisition (Part II)

This is a continuation of my previous post:

Dutech Holdings – What’s Next? Realize $117k Profit, Hold Or Add More? (Part I)

Which is in turn a continuation of my initial investing thesis written way back:

Dutech Holdings Investing Thesis

47) Dutech Holdings logo

In this post, I’ll aim to project what goes into Dutech Holdings’ FY16Q4 results, as well as analyze in detail their most recent acquisition.

Now, CIMB’s coverage of Dutech’s financials is pretty extensive, and although in my previous post I cross referenced their DCF with mine to illustrate some slight differences, in this and subsequent posts I won’t repeat what’s already in their report.

Cos there’s really no value in doing that.

Their analyst report is widely available and anyone can go read it. I don’t think SG TTI’s readers want to come here and read some snippets of repeated data cut and paste from somewhere else, or some superficial unsubstantiated thoughts.

Instead, here I’ll discuss some pertinent facts that as far as I can tell, nobody has recognized, brought up, dissected or discussed.

Yet these points, as you’ll see, are telling.


4. Scalability Of Dutech’s Business, Long Term Compounding Of Earnings

I separated this into a post on it’s own as it’s going to be long.

In part I, we’ve already seen how Dutech has a long term track record of profitability, increasing earnings over the years, growth both organically as well as via M&As and they’ve done this on the back of minimal debt.

Any debt that resides in Dutech’s BS currently comes from their acquired subsidiaries and are not bank loans taken up for acquisitions.

Dutech’s key man, Dr Johnny Liu, has thus far, IMO been insightful and his track record has been spotless.

I’ve also worked out the valuation in Part I by doing a peer comparison, as well as a DCF model. (Yes, I’ve received a fair bit of feedback from emails and on Investing Note that the share price has risen a bit since Part I, but I’m really talking in terms of much bigger gains than a few % points)

All these are somewhat backward looking though, and since future gains are substantially affected by what the company does in future, here I’ll attempt to do the impossible and try to peer into Dutech’s future.


Stellar FY16 results

Approximately a month from now, Dutech is scheduled to release FY16Q4 and FY16 results. I’m expecting a set of stellar results. By “stellar”, I mean at least the 2nd best set of FY earnings in the last 7 years (that’s as far back the data I’ve analyzed), and in all likelihood, record earnings by a mile.

This table shows Dutech’s long term record of EPS:

(RMB’000) FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 9M16
Earnings per share (RMB cents) 18.11 10.16 11.29 28.15 40.02 33.1 29.53

As of 9M16, Dutech’s EPS has already exceeded the full year earnings 3 years ago, and is poised to well exceed FY15.


Extraordinary Gain In FY16Q4

In FY16Q4, Dutech completed it’s acquisition of parts (most parts in fact) of the insolvent Metric Group.

412) Dutech's acquisition of Metric.jpg

I’ll spend some time discussing this Metric acquisition and it’s prospects for Dutech as there seems to be quite a bit of confusion (based on the queries I’ve received and discussions on Investing Note after my Part I post)

It’s no surprise why it’s confusing, because the names of the acquired parts are similar, and they changed the name of the holding company just recently.

1stly, it should be obvious at first glance from the announcement, that Dutech got a helluva deal by picking the carcass of an insolvent Metric Group.

Dutech paid up S$4.5mil in cash, which is a tiny chink of the S$69mil in cash and cash equivalents that the company has as of mrq.

In turn, Dutech received S$6.1mil worth of inventory, and intangible assets of S$13.8mil.

Wow. Talk about driving a hard bargain.

But that’s typical of insolvency proceedings. The administrator takes over the company, shields it temporarily from creditors, halts the business and sells off all parts as best as they could. The proceeds are then given to the creditors according to the hierarchy rights, and in all likelihood in this case, the shareholders of Metric walked away empty handed.

From the figures above, it’d also mean that Dutech is likely to recognize a one off, extraordinary gain from this M&A in FY16Q4. This is on top of it’s organic growth (see EPS table above).

Which is why I said I’m expecting stellar results.

Exactly how stellar is this extraordinary gain going to be? Well, I can’t tell exactly, cos that depends on how much of the goodwill Dutech’s accountants decide to write off.

But assuming they recognise the full sum above, Dutech will recognize a total gain of S$15.5mil, which works out to be.. <gasp> about 21 RMB cents more!

I had to rework my figures a few times to make sure I got it right.

If that’s true, that’s going to blow out the EPS for FY16 to somewhere close to 60RMB cents, which is record EPS by a mile.

Even if Dutech decides to write off some of the goodwill, I can’t see how there won’t be an additional 20 RMB cents or so added to earnings come FY16Q4 from this acquisition.

Again, bear in mind this extraordinary gain, is on top of the current large jump in earnings in FY16.

Fact: In every quarter of FY16 (Q1, Q2 & Q3) thus far, Dutech’s earnings has exceeded the same period in the preceding year by approximately 20%.


Previous M&As

One of the ways to understand this metric acquisition, is to understand Dutech’s past track record of acquisitions. And here, we have plenty of material to work with, seeing that Dutech is not exactly a virgin in the M&A field.

In FY15Q4, Dutech acquired Krauth by paying 200K euros for it’s shares, and another 250K for know how and patents etc.

“The net tangible asset of Krauth was €220,000 as at 31 August, 2015.”

413) Dutech's acquisition of Krauth.jpg

OK, so Dutech paid 200K euros for something that’s assessed to be worth 220K euros. So… they should recognize a gain on acquisition of 20K euros right? Nothing to shout about.

20K euros, based on an exchange rate of 1 euro = 7.3 RMB, should be = 146,000 RMB

But check out FY16Q1 results:

414) Dutech FY16Q1 gain on bargain purchase.jpg

Oh boy, I was surprised to see a gain of 2,547,000 RMB as opposed to just 146,000 RMB.

And what’s the given explanation?

415) Source of Dutech's extraordinary gain in FY16Q1.jpg

OK so basically the company is saying, after paying 200K euros for what is assessed to be 220K worth of assets as of August 2015, this 220K euros worth of assets is actually worth (200K euros + 2,547,000 RMB = 550K euros) in March 2016.

The next question that pops into my mind is, what accounts for this additional difference? Is it cold hard assets/inventory? Or is it in the form of goodwill?

Since the statements are audited, if the difference is in the form of inventory, I’d feel much more comforted. Goodwill is, well, arbitrary. It’s as good as what you want it to be.

This is an important point to investigate, because if management has a long term track record of arbitrarily raising goodwill in M&As and recognizing that as an extraordinary item to earnings… well I’m liquidating my stake and I’m outta here before anyone else. Good luck to the bag holders still hanging around.

So how did I investigate? Bear with me as I go into the micro-specifics just this once. (Won’t do it here for all the other acquisitions. Math is not meant to be done on a laptop)

416) Dutech's BS FY16Q1.jpg

Here we can see as of FY15Q4, Dutech carried 10,037,000 RMB of intangible assets. In the Krauth acquisition above, they also paid 250,000 euros (1,825,000 RMB) for knowhow, and that’s added to this intangible assets.

417) Dutech's depreciation and amortisation in FY16Q1.jpg

In FY16Q1 though, they amortised 1,365,000 RMB worth of intangibles.

This means that as of FY16Q1, the BS should have (10,037,000 + 1,825,000 – 1,365,000) RMB worth of intangibles. = 10,497,000 RMB

As we can see in the BS above, as of FY16Q1, the intangibles amount carried in the BS is 10,859,000 RMB, which is not too far from the 10,497,000 RMB. Part of the difference can be explained by rounding errors and partly by differences in the forex rates used for the calculation.

What I’m trying to illustrate here, is that most of the (extra) extraordinary gain, if not all, came from Krauth’s inventory.

Dutech didn’t explain in greater detail how this extra extraordinary gain came about, but as long as it’s not some imaginary goodwill/intangibles figure, I’m happy with it.

On a related note, in the earlier Tom Gayner video I referenced:

https://www.nextinsight.net/story-archive-mainmenu-60/938-2016/11215-investor-guru-thinking-differently-from-when-i-first-started-out

I remember someone in the audience asked how can a retail investor with no real access to management, judge whether the management is capable and has integrity.

Well, I think my above teardown on the accounting specifics, will be one of the nuances that hint at the integrity of the management. Sure, a single example may not be adequate. But do this enough times and along various aspects, and you’d get a pretty good picture over time.

By digging deep and looking at the details, one can glean precious information about how the management conducts itself. Another simple example: even the consistent 1,365,000 RMB in amortization every quarter, tells me a lot about how conservative the management is and the management’s attitude towards intangibles.


Dutech’s Value Proposition For Metric Group’s Operations

To assess the merits of the acquisition, and to see how Dutech can turn around Metric, of course we’ll need to have some in depth knowledge of Metric Group.

This is Metric’s FY results, up to FY15:

418-metric-group-financials

Lost money in 4 of the past 5 years, with -ve CFO in 3 of the past 5 years. Is it any wonder that they’re insolvent?

But wait! There is a silver lining. EBITDA is actually positive in 2015. Part of the reason for the losses comes from non cash items like D&A, and of course cash items such as all the administrative and finance costs, taxes etc.

What’s cause for some optimism, is the CFO. Regular readers of SG TTI would know I personally love CFs. 6.7mil Euros from CFO is a massive improvement.

Metric Group’s main business units are divided into a “Public Transport” unit, a “Retail & Logistics” unit (Both located in Hanover) as well as a car park ticketing unit, under a subsidiary Metric UK (Based in UK).

419) Metric ticketing.jpg

The Public Transport and Retail & Logistics units do not have their own manufacturing plant for their products. It’s obvious that Dutech is going to use what has worked marvelously in their previous acquisitions: Apply Dutech’s lean, efficient and low cost production chains in Shanghai to support these 2 metric units.

Metric UK has it’s own manufacturing plant, but I like this unit a lot. Mainly because it provides recurring income for Dutech. Every car park ticketing machine sold has attached maintenance contracts, and this provides a constant recurring income for Dutech.

Metric UK is the ONLY car park ticketing machine manufacturer in UK.

Their latest ticketing machines have features such as video displays for advertising, and this potentially may generate a new income stream for their clients.

My understanding is that Metric UK intends to use this as a selling point for their clients to replace their older ticketing machines with these new ones, which would in turn, generate maintenance contracts for Metric UK.

Also, newer ticketing machines have features like wireless payment:

420) Cardiff_Main_image1.jpg

In fact, as of Nov 2016, the city of Cardiff in Wales has decided to adopt Metric UK’s ticketing machine and is in the midst of rolling it out city wide.

All in all, I don’t think Dutech is going to reinvent the wheel here. They’ve successfully executed this before, and this is going to be a replay of what they’ve done previously. The previous turnaround of DTMT took much faster than I expected, and I don’t think it’ll be different this time around.

FY17 would likely see an increase in administrative expenses due to integration costs, similar to in FY15 when Dutech was integrating DTMT.

This acquisition though, also does mean that Dutech’s exposure to Forex is now increased further as Metric UK’s operating currency is in pounds.

Some of you (on Investing Note) seem to have trouble getting the relevant financials for Metric in English, so here it is.

(Again, don’t ask me where I got these from. I honestly don’t remember, it’s been at least a couple of months)

metric-group-ar-2015

metric-group-financial-statement-2015

metric-group-fyq16q1-results

(Grrr all that is taking up a lot of my allocated free data space so quickly save it. I might delete them when this post gets old and nobody reads it)


I really intended for this Dutech update to be a 2 part post… but that’s too ambitious I guess. This is way too long so there will be a 3rd part afterall.

All mega blockbuster movies these days come in trilogies anyway right?

P.S. The math above and basically this entire post is written by a very tired TTI at 3am in the morning. So if you spot any errors, pls feel free to embarrass me.

Advertisements

10 comments

  1. Hi TTTI

    Thanks for your analysis, enjoyed your parts 1 and 2 of dutech analysis as always.

    Interesting to see your example of the krauth case how they’ve managed to gain from the net difference of the carrying asset versus what they’ve paid. In essence, they are buying $1 for 50 cents and seems to continue buying distressed assets again this time round.

    I think key would be how they will manage a business turnaround for metric. Thanks again for your analysis.

    Like

  2. Hi TTI,
    Wow ! Very detail and in depth analysis on this company ,,,yah ! Strongly agreed that ” Goodwill ” is just a ” good to view ” nothing tangible,,,:-) This is the problem brought down the value of Singpost and resulting share price to tumble for the past few months… :-(. Hope Alibaba could do some magic from now onwards,,, !!
    Cheers!!

    Like

      1. Yah ! Signpost is sitting with huge ” good will ” after high profile acquisition of other logistic arm and e-commerce company like ,,, Trade Global and Famous Pacific Shipping ” ,,, which most of analysts and investors thinks they are paying high valuations for these acquisition,,,,
        I hope the new CEO and Alibaba could change the course of their direction with better result..
        Cheers!! :-)

        Like

        1. Yah, the company was in the news for all the wrong reasons in 2016.
          Actually, I thought Wolfgang was doing very well running the company until all the allegations of impropriety started surfacing…
          Then when the chairman delegate declined to take up his post…. that really sunk confidence.
          Hope the new CEO can do better.

          Like

  3. Been reading your blog for the past week (read almost every single post lol) and I’d first like to applaud your efforts in openly sharing your investment ideas and thought process, very few people out there do that in Singapore.

    Dutech and Boustead seem to boast Outsider CEOs don’t they?

    For Dutech, I think what’s suppressing its price (ok, short of CIMB inflating it with their coverage) is the “Chinese” discount that investors are placing on it. Compounders like Dutech would already have flown if it was listed in the US, with TTM 25.0x-30.0x PE slapped on them for good measure.

    I don’t know if you favor American companies with similar management, apart from Markel, do check Danaher out – very similar model albeit with ultra aggressive management which may cause discomfort for some.

    Like

    1. Hi Matt
      Thanks for your comments.
      Dutech and Boustead’s CEOs are the 2 CEOs I most respect amongst all companies on SGX currently.
      You’re absolutely right, Dutech is still being labelled as a S-chip because of it’s chinese roots, despite having international operations and with most it’s revenue coming from everywhere except China.
      PE 6+ is ridiculously cheap IMO, and as I’ve shown in Part I, the next comparable competitor trades at 20+ PE.
      Another reason for the low valuations is that the company is very low profile. Their website is obscure, their IR is non existent and they don’t bother to do any roadshows or anything of such.
      Thank you for your suggestion, I’ll take a look at Danaher.
      TTI

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s